Back to Blog
Displaycal correction database7/23/2023 ![]() OK ill do that today and wil also use more testpatches to be more accurate. ![]() This reply was modified 3 years ago by Vincent. And if you can, re calibrate and use that profile type I explained previously. Hence => verification report, let’s see numbers. but from your words seems related to TRC or profile choice or some apps oversimplification while color managing dark tones. That’s why I asked you to give us a hint or WP deviation…. Wrong correction will show wrong white point, tipically visually deviated in a* axis. I’m afraid that it cannot be attached here because IP.Īnyway… your issues are not related to correction. It’s in some paid software from NEC or in some free but closed testing app like Lightspace ZERO. All of them are equal for ArgyllCMS (yours is slower, but that’s all) This will minimize some apps truncation errors while color managing. If your CX240 has aged well and still is well behaved you should be able to get an accurate description of display with a SINGLE CURVE+MATRIX profile and black point compensation ON. My advice will be to run a verification report (use U2413 correction) of calibrated display against its own profile (all simulation profile options disabled), check if all is ok, or attach HTML report here.Īlso some apps may behave bad if you do not use oversimplified profiles. ![]() Your issue seems to be linked to un expected TRC or that you were used to see it in the wrong way previously. Your issue is not related to corrections or wrong white point. Is this a bundled correction? My displaycal doesn’t have it it seems. The GB-r-LED IPS (Dell U2413) would be first choice for another probe than I have? What correction would you advise me to use with the CX240 and the colormunki display? There is another GB-LED EDR (PA242W) with a blue led which peak is in just a few shorter wavelength. Is there a way to determine which of the corrections is best anyway? I assume the ‘verification’ uses the same correction as the calibration itself? I’ve used different correction profiles: the one standard with the software and the one from the community made for the cx240. The shadows are too deep and the rest of the image is too bright. Please develop last sentence, if possible give some visual hint in a* axis and b* axis of what you see as “wrong”, your white point target and CCSS correction used for your device.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |